Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTamblyn, NAL
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-03T14:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that rescission of a contract and restitution of what passed under it are best viewed as two distinct operations. Similarly, inability to give counter-restitution, lapse of time, and third party rights, should not be bars to rescission; they are best accommodated at the restitution stage.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 33 (2)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/28768
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_GB
dc.titleSeparating Rescission and Restitutionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1030-7230
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted author manuscript. The final version is available via Lexis®Library.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Contract Lawen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-19T15:06:07Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record