Separating Rescission and Restitution
dc.contributor.author | Tamblyn, NAL | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-03T14:15:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article argues that rescission of a contract and restitution of what passed under it are best viewed as two distinct operations. Similarly, inability to give counter-restitution, lapse of time, and third party rights, should not be bars to rescission; they are best accommodated at the restitution stage. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 33 (2) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/28768 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | LexisNexis | en_GB |
dc.title | Separating Rescission and Restitution | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1030-7230 | |
dc.description | This is the accepted author manuscript. The final version is available via Lexis®Library. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Contract Law | en_GB |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-02-19T15:06:07Z |