Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaintier, SDA
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-17T13:22:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-02
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The enduring paradox and divisiveness of good faith is well known; although a fundamental principle in most European continental systems, in a growing number of common law countries as well as in numerous European and international instruments,1 good faith is still ill understood and controversial. This article aims to untangle some of the tensions surrounding the notion, with specific reference to French and English laws in order to see whether it is indeed possible that the concept "in itself should not keep common and civil lawyers divided". [...]en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 6, pp. 441-460en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/28955
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributorsen_GB
dc.subjectCivil lawen_GB
dc.subjectCommon lawen_GB
dc.subjectComparative lawen_GB
dc.subjectContractsen_GB
dc.subjectFranceen_GB
dc.subjectGood faithen_GB
dc.titleThe elusive notion of good faith in the performance of a contract, why still a bête noire for the civil and the common law?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0021-9460
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The definitive published version J.B.L. 2017, 6, 441-460 is available online on Westlaw UKen_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Business Lawen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record