School‐based interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review with multiple synthesis methods
Moore, D; Russell, A; Matthews, J; et al.Ford, T; Rogers, M; Ukoumunne, OC; Kneale, D; Thompson Coon, J; Sutcliffe, K; Nunns, M; Shaw, L; Gwernan-Jones, R
Date: 18 October 2018
Article
Journal
Review of Education
Publisher
Wiley / British Educational Research Association (BERA)
Publisher DOI
Abstract
Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are useful
treatments, but it is unclear how effective school-based interventions are for a range of outcomes
and which features of interventions are most effective. This paper systematically reviews
randomized controlled trial evidence of the effectiveness ...
Non-pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are useful
treatments, but it is unclear how effective school-based interventions are for a range of outcomes
and which features of interventions are most effective. This paper systematically reviews
randomized controlled trial evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for children with
ADHD in school settings. Three methods of synthesis were used to explore the effectiveness of
interventions, whether certain types of interventions are more effective than others and which
components of interventions lead to effective academic outcomes. Twenty-eight studies (n=1,807)
were included in the review. Eight types of interventions were evaluated and a range of different
ADHD symptoms, difficulties and school outcomes were assessed across studies. Meta-analysis
demonstrated beneficial effects for interventions that combine multiple features (median effect
size g=0.37, interquartile range 0.32, range 0.09 to 1.13) and suggest some promise for daily
report card interventions (median g=0.0.62, IQR=0.25, range 0.13 to 1.62). Meta-regression
analyses did not give a consistent message regarding which types of interventions were more
effective than others. Finally, qualitative comparative analysis demonstrated that self-regulation
and one-to-one intervention delivery were important components of interventions that were
effective for academic outcomes. These two components were not sufficient though; when they
appeared with personalisation for individual recipients and delivery in the classroom, or when
interventions did not aim to improve child relationships, interventions were effective. This review
provides updated information about the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions
specific to school settings and gives tentative messages about important features of these
interventions for academic outcomes.
School of Education
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0