Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFonseca, M
dc.contributor.authorNormann, HT
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T12:16:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-09
dc.description.abstractFactors facilitating collusion may not successfully predict cartel occurrence: When a factor predicts that collusion (explicit and tacit) becomes easier, firms might be less inclined to set up a cartel simply because tacit coordination already tends to go in hand with supra‐competitive profits. We illustrate this issue with laboratory data. We run n‐firm Cournot experiments with written cheap‐talk communication between players and we compare them to treatments without the possibility to talk. We conduct this comparison for two, four, and six firms. We find that two firms indeed find it easier to collude tacitly but that the number of firms does not significantly affect outcomes with communication. As a result, the payoff gain from communication increases with the number of firms, at a decreasing rate.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 9 August 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/soej.12278
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/33888
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Southern Economic Associationen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 9 August 2020 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2018 by the Southern Economic Associationen_GB
dc.titleWhy factors facilitating collusion may not predict cartel occurrence — experimental evidenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0038-4038
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalSouthern Economic Journalen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record