Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKagiaros, D
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T09:18:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-17
dc.description.abstractShould terminally ill patients have a right to assisted suicide? Should same-sex couples have a right to marry and adopt? The book examines how such questions can be resolved within the framework of the European Convention of Human Rights.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationIn: Building Consensus on European Consensus - Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyond, edited by Panos Kapotas and Vassilis P. Tzevelekos. Chapter 13, pp. 283-310.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108564779.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34437
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 17 July 2019 in compliance with publisher policy. en_GB
dc.rights© Cambridge University Press 2019.
dc.subjectLawen_GB
dc.titleWhen to use European Consensus: Assessing the Differential Treatment of Minority Groups by the European Court of Human Rightsen_GB
dc.typeBook chapteren_GB
dc.contributor.editorKapotas, Pen_GB
dc.contributor.editorTzevelekos, Ven_GB
dc.identifier.isbn9781108473323
dc.relation.isPartOfBuilding Consensus on European Consensus Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyonden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record