Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiao, S
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Z
dc.contributor.authorWang, Y
dc.contributor.authorCiais, P
dc.contributor.authorYao, Y
dc.contributor.authorPeng, S
dc.contributor.authorChevallier, F
dc.contributor.authorFriedlingstein, P
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, IA
dc.contributor.authorPeñuelas, J
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.contributor.authorWang, T
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T10:35:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-15
dc.description.abstractNo consensus has yet been reached on the major factors driving the observed increase in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 in the northern latitudes. In this study, we used atmospheric CO2 records from 26 northern hemisphere stations with a temporal coverage longer than 15 years, and an atmospheric transport model prescribed with net biome productivity (NBP) from an ensemble of nine terrestrial ecosystem models, to attribute change in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2 . We found significant (p < .05) increases in seasonal peak-to-trough CO2 amplitude (AMPP-T ) at nine stations, and in trough-to-peak amplitude (AMPT-P ) at eight stations over the last three decades. Most of the stations that recorded increasing amplitudes are in Arctic and boreal regions (>50°N), consistent with previous observations that the amplitude increased faster at Barrow (Arctic) than at Mauna Loa (subtropics). The multi-model ensemble mean (MMEM) shows that the response of ecosystem carbon cycling to rising CO2 concentration (eCO2 ) and climate change are dominant drivers of the increase in AMPP-T and AMPT-P in the high latitudes. At the Barrow station, the observed increase of AMPP-T and AMPT-P over the last 33 years is explained by eCO2 (39% and 42%) almost equally than by climate change (32% and 35%). The increased carbon losses during the months with a net carbon release in response to eCO2 are associated with higher ecosystem respiration due to the increase in carbon storage caused by eCO2 during carbon uptake period. Air-sea CO2 fluxes (10% for AMPP-T and 11% for AMPT-P ) and the impacts of land-use change (marginally significant 3% for AMPP-T and 4% for AMPT-P ) also contributed to the CO2 measured at Barrow, highlighting the role of these factors in regulating seasonal changes in the global carbon cycle.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41530528), the BELSPO STEREO project ECOPROPHET (SR00334), the 111 Project (B14001), and the National Youth Top‐notch Talent Support Program in China. Philippe Ciais, Ivan A Janssens and Josep Peñuelas acknowledge support from the European Research Council through Synergy grant ERC‐2013‐SyG‐610028 “P‐IMBALANCE”.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 24 (2), pp. 608 - 616en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.13909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34448
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915315en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_GB
dc.subjectCO2 fertilization effecten_GB
dc.subjectamplitude of atmospheric CO2en_GB
dc.subjectattributionen_GB
dc.subjectclimate changeen_GB
dc.subjectdetectionen_GB
dc.subjectland-use changeen_GB
dc.titleOn the causes of trends in the seasonal amplitude of atmospheric CO2en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-25T10:35:15Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalGlobal Change Biologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record