Interpreting RCT, process evaluation and case study evidence in evaluating the Integrated Group Reading (IGR) programme: a teacher-led, classroom-based intervention for Year 2 and 3 pupils struggling to read

Abstract

Almost 20% of English pupils still experience difficulties in reading despite a predominantly phonics approach that works well for most children, but not for all; so other approaches need to be explored. The IGR programme involves an inclusive approach to targeted teaching led by class teachers using a group-based class organisation and the integration of diverse research-based approaches (language and phonics-based). IGR has been evaluated in thirty-four English schools in five varied local authority areas using a cluster randomised design and a process evaluation. IGR was found to support enjoyment of reading with as much reading gains as the more phonics-oriented programmes used in control classes. Following its use, there were gains in teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching reading, and no negative effects on the class pupils’ reading. This study shows what a more inclusive approach to targeted reading intervention can achieve with a well-resourced programme. Questions can be about the interpretation of RCT findings when it comes to classroom-based educational interventions, and about teacher choice in opting for alternate teaching approaches.