dc.contributor.author | Sterner, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Barbier, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Bateman, IJ | |
dc.contributor.author | van den Bijgaart, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Crepin, A-S | |
dc.contributor.author | Edenhofer, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Fischer, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Habla, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Hassler, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Johansson-Stenman, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Lange, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Polasky, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Rockstrom, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, HG | |
dc.contributor.author | Steffen, W | |
dc.contributor.author | Wagner, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilen, JE | |
dc.contributor.author | Alpizar, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Azar, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Carless, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Chavez, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Coria, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Engstrom, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Jagers, SC | |
dc.contributor.author | Kohlin, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Lofgren, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Pleijel, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-16T09:27:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | Today, more than ever, ‘Spaceship Earth’ is an apt metaphor as we chart the boundaries for a safe planet1. Social scientists both analyse why society courts disaster by approaching or even overstepping these boundaries and try to design suitable policies to avoid these perils. Because the threats of transgressing planetary boundaries are global, long-run, uncertain and interconnected, they must be analysed together to avoid conflicts and take advantage of synergies. To obtain policies that are effective at both international and local levels requires careful analysis of the underlying mechanisms across scientific disciplines and approaches, and must take politics into account. In this Perspective, we examine the complexities of designing policies that can keep Earth within the biophysical limits favourable to human life. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Stockholm Resilience Centre | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | BECC - Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Mistra Carbon Exit | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 2, pp. 14-21 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41893-018-0194-x | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/35473 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Nature Research | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 10 July 2019 in compliance with publisher policy | |
dc.rights | © 2018 Nature Research | en_GB |
dc.title | Policy design for the Anthropocene | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-16T09:27:19Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2398-9629 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Nature Sustainability | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-11-21 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018-11-21 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-01-15T05:59:11Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |