The promiscuity of publishing partners
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P; Alexander, A; Papageorgiou, K; et al.Daellenbach, U
Date: 20 June 2018
Publisher
ISPIM: International Society for Professional Innovation Management
Related links
Abstract
While some empirical evidence indicates clear benefits to coauthorship in terms of speed, volume and diffusion of publishing outcomes, coauthorships have also been shown to be prone to difficulties. There is also limited
guidance available on how to initiate new publishing partnerships with higher
likelihood of success. Through a ...
While some empirical evidence indicates clear benefits to coauthorship in terms of speed, volume and diffusion of publishing outcomes, coauthorships have also been shown to be prone to difficulties. There is also limited
guidance available on how to initiate new publishing partnerships with higher
likelihood of success. Through a review of literatures on co-authorship across
numerous disciplines, we are able to identify author attributes that could provide
some initial search criteria for evaluating prospective publishing partnerships.
However, this same review suggests that the process through which successful
co-authorships develop is complex, being influenced by contextual factors and
with varying—even contradictory—outcomes associated with individual
attributes and their combinations. With a view on the innovation management
field, we argue that it is essential to extend previous research to analyze multiple
author attributes and success measures simultaneously, encompass both
individual and organizational-level variables, as well as understand the
specificities of certain research areas and disciplinary traditions
Management
Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0