The promiscuity of publishing partners

Abstract

While some empirical evidence indicates clear benefits to coauthorship in terms of speed, volume and diffusion of publishing outcomes, coauthorships have also been shown to be prone to difficulties. There is also limited guidance available on how to initiate new publishing partnerships with higher likelihood of success. Through a review of literatures on co-authorship across numerous disciplines, we are able to identify author attributes that could provide some initial search criteria for evaluating prospective publishing partnerships. However, this same review suggests that the process through which successful co-authorships develop is complex, being influenced by contextual factors and with varying—even contradictory—outcomes associated with individual attributes and their combinations. With a view on the innovation management field, we argue that it is essential to extend previous research to analyze multiple author attributes and success measures simultaneously, encompass both individual and organizational-level variables, as well as understand the specificities of certain research areas and disciplinary traditions