Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoeree, Jacob K
dc.contributor.authorLindsay, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-21T10:52:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-25
dc.description.abstractMarkets have an exposure problem when getting to the optimal allocationrequires a sequence of transactions which if started but not completed leavesat least one trader with losses. We use laboratory experiments to evaluatethe effect of the exposure problem on alternative market mechanisms. Thecontinuous double auction performs poorly: efficiency is only 20% when expo-sure is high and 55% when it is low. A package market effectively eliminatesthe exposure problem: in low and high exposure treatments efficiency is 82%and 89% respectively. Building on stability notions from matching theory weintroduce the concept of mechanism stability. A model of trade that com-bines mechanism stability with noisy best responses and imperfect foresightexplains the difference in market performance. Finally, decentralized bargai-ning with contingent contracts performs well with perfect information andcommunication but not in the more realistic case when traders’ preferencesare privately known.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 25 September 2019
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/restud/rdz048
dc.identifier.grantnumberESEI-249433en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37612
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectExposure problemen_GB
dc.subjectpackage marketsen_GB
dc.subjectmarket designen_GB
dc.subjectlaboratory experimentsen_GB
dc.titleThe exposure problem and market designen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-21T10:52:03Z
dc.identifier.issn0034-6527
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from OUP via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe Review of Economic Studiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-17
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-20T14:41:00Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-11T11:00:46Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.