Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMountford-Zimdars, AK
dc.contributor.authorMoore, J
dc.contributor.authorHigham, L
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T09:52:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-31
dc.description.abstractHigher Education Institutions in England are an integral part of the government’s social mobility strategy. Contextualisation of undergraduate admissions decisions has emerged as a key tool towards progressing social mobility objectives. The present paper builds on our previous 2013 research by describing findings from 15 qualitative interviews with stakeholders in contextualised admissions. Stakeholders were drawn from government, non-governmental and third sector bodies including those representing the voice of schools and young people. We find that data challenges continue to be a main barrier to the application of contextual admissions. Respondents thought that more consistency and transparency between universities would be helpful to assist applicants and those who support them to better understand contextual data use in undergraduate admissions. Views are divided about whether differential admissions offers represent the most important application of contextual data. Respondents saw potential for using contextual data beyond admissions for supporting students at university and into further study or employment.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Access Projecten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 31 July 2019.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13603108.2019.1640802
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37707
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 31 January 2021 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.subjectundergraduate admissionsen_GB
dc.subjectfair admissionsen_GB
dc.subjectaccessen_GB
dc.subjectwidening participationen_GB
dc.subjectcontextual dataen_GB
dc.titleWhat is the current state of debate around the use of contextualised admissions for undergraduate admissions? A review of the current stakeholder perspectiveen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-27T09:52:12Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis (Routledge) via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1460-7018
dc.identifier.journalPerspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Educationen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-14
exeter.funder::The Access Projecten_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-14
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-27T09:50:40Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record