Weaknesses in the Law Protecting the United Kingdom’s Remarkable Underwater Cultural Heritage: The Need for Modernisation and Reform
dc.contributor.author | Martin, JB | |
dc.contributor.author | Gane, T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-19T14:40:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Despite the United Kingdom (UK) having been regarded as one of the richest hotspots for underwater cultural heritage (UCH), its policy and practice regarding its protection has displayed some areas of weakness. This paper makes a case to review the legal framework and its overall administration in the UK, in order to protect and preserve any remaining UCH before it is further lost or damaged. First, we introduce some of the flaws in the UK’s legal system protecting UCH, demonstrating how it has led to a considerable loss of cultural heritage and underlining how it is in need of modernisation. This includes discussion of issues raised in a number of recent cases, including the proposed Victory (1744) recovery project, the proposed Goodwin Sands dredging licence and various cases relating to the illegal recovery of material. We then map out how policy is implemented in practice and the role played by various institutions involved with its administration, where we find a schism between what policy intends and what it is achieving in practice. This takes us towards a broader discussion on how legislative reform might look, including a more proactive and ambitious approach to the future management and enjoyment of the UK’s impressive UCH. Here we argue the need for better engagement at the global and regional negotiating table, as well as in favour of adopting a unified and consistent policy which aims to be more sustainable, precautionary, proportionate and inclusive. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 9 September 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11457-019-09240-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38046 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. | |
dc.subject | UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage | en_GB |
dc.subject | Marine Management | en_GB |
dc.subject | Underwater Archaeology Policy | en_GB |
dc.subject | Heritage Management | en_GB |
dc.subject | United Kingdom | en_GB |
dc.title | Weaknesses in the Law Protecting the United Kingdom’s Remarkable Underwater Cultural Heritage: The Need for Modernisation and Reform | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-19T14:40:00Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1557-2285 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Spriner Verlag via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Maritime Archaeology | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-07-19 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-07-19 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-07-19T13:27:53Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-10-11T13:24:25Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2019.
Open Access.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.