Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEisenbarth, S
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T10:03:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-22
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses whether China's export VAT rebates and export taxes are driven by environmental concerns. Since China struggles to enforce environmental regulation, trade policy can be used as a second-best environmental policy. In a general equilibrium model it is possible to show that the second-best export tax increases in a product's pollution intensity. The empirical analysis investigates whether the export tax equivalent of partial VAT rebates and export taxes are higher for products which are more pollution intensive along several dimensions. The results indicate that the VAT rebate rates are set in a way that discourages exports of water pollution intensive, SO2 intensive and energy intensive products from 2007 on. Moreover, the conservation of natural resources such as minerals, metals, wood products and precious stones seems to be a key determinant of China's export VAT rebate rates. There is little evidence that export taxes are motivated by environmental concerns.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 82, pp. 74 - 103en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeem.2016.10.001
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/J500100/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39144
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.subjectExport VAT rebatesen_GB
dc.subjectExport taxesen_GB
dc.subjectTrade policyen_GB
dc.subjectSecond-best environmental policyen_GB
dc.subjectAir pollutionen_GB
dc.subjectWater pollutionen_GB
dc.subjectEnergy intensityen_GB
dc.subjectNatural resourcesen_GB
dc.subjectMetal productsen_GB
dc.titleIs Chinese trade policy motivated by environmental concerns?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-10-10T10:03:41Z
dc.identifier.issn0095-0696
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Environmental Economics and Managementen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-10-20
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-10-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-10-10T10:00:50Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-10T10:03:47Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)