Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGallaher, B
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T12:57:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-15
dc.description.abstractThis article distances the classic Patristic teaching of Eastern Orthodoxy on theosis from the pseudo-religious ideology of transhumanism. By appealing to the Silver Age of Russian theologians a century ago, today’s transhumanist vision is dubbed Mangodhood, an idolatrous construction of a technological Tower of Babel. In contrast, the classical Orthodox teaching of deification or theosis relies on the spiritual grace of the true God, rendering the true goal of religion to be Godmanhood.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 32 (2), pp. 200 - 215en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0953946819827136
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39217
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019 Article reuse guidelines:sagepub.com/journals-permissionsen_GB
dc.subjectOrthodoxyen_GB
dc.subjectMangodhooden_GB
dc.subjectGodmanhooden_GB
dc.subjecttranshumanismen_GB
dc.subjectSatanen_GB
dc.subjectHomo Deusen_GB
dc.subjecttheosisen_GB
dc.subjectdeificationen_GB
dc.titleGodmanhood vs Mangodhood: An eastern orthodox response to transhumanismen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-10-15T12:57:21Z
dc.identifier.issn0953-9468
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalStudies in Christian Ethicsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-15
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-02-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-10-15T12:53:48Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-15T12:57:24Z
refterms.panelDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record